Reception Theory posits that producers encode preferred meaning into texts, but the lived experience of audiences influences how they decode those meanings in three ways. The preferred reading aligns with both the ideological position and messaging in a text; a negotiated reading aligns with the ideological position but disagrees (on some level) with the messaging; and an oppositional reading rejects both.
Hall points
out that genre conventions are used by producers to construct preferred
meanings. For example, D83 uses genre conventions to encode a sympathetic representation
of its protagonist. Tropes like the sick mother and sequences like the training
montage encode a preferred reading of Martin as a devoted son on a hero’s
journey. This subverts the conventional narrative of a NATO hero, and applying
Hall allows us to predict that the audience’s situated logics will impact the
reading, accepting, rejecting, or modifying their response, perhaps based on
their national identity, or lived experience of the period. Stranger Things
is more conventional, using familiar sci-fi tropes to encode a representation
of the U.S. government as irresponsible in scientific experiments and conspiratorial
in its cover up. However, unlike D83, which is grounded in a realistic
representation of the period, Stranger Things is less likely to invite a
range of readings because its diegesis is so obviously fictional. So, audiences
may choose to decode the show within its generic framework, without necessarily
applying their socio-political perspective to its reading. This foregrounds the
significance of genre within Hall’s theoretical framework.
A potential weakness of Hall’s theory is that it focuses on
a singular preferred reading. This seems ineffective when analysing the ambiguity
of encoded messaging, especially in Deutschland 83. Take Lenora: is she a
villain for working against NATO, a hero for serving her country? If
we have no clear preferred reading surely Hall is ineffective. But what if the
encoded messaging is that the Cold War was a time of great ambiguity? In that
case, applying Hall may be very revealing. The German release of the show was
unsuccessful, perhaps because the lived experience of audiences may have prompted
uncomfortably oppositional socio-political readings. However, it was well
received by U.S. and U.K. audiences, whose distance from the nation of origin
may have allowed more dispassionate negotiated readings of the text. So,
applying Hall proves very useful as a window to understanding critical and
economic success in relation to national identity.
400 WORDS – UP TO THIS POINT IS WORTH ABOUT 7 OR 8 OUT OF
10.
Reception
Theory encourages us to analyse the way that media texts naturalise hegemony. Stranger
Things arguably encodes a preferred reading that naturalises the
normativity of the nuclear family by presenting the stable Wheeler household as
the social norm and implying that Will is kidnapped due to his vulnerability as
the child of a single working mother. Hall points out that the ‘situated
logics’ of audience members could lead to a negotiated reading, which accepts
the conservative ideology of the nuclear family, but rejects the messaging
around Will’s kidnapping, or takes an oppositional position regarding both. However,
it is also possible that this is a fundamental misreading of the messaging of
the text, which later presents Joyce as a dogged and devoted mother and the
Wheeler parents as oblivious to the goings on in their town. This highlights a
potential weakness in Hall’s theory as it directs us to seek out hegemony where
they are not intended.
550 WORDS – BY THE END, THIS IS NOW CLOSER TO 9 OR 10 OUT OF 10.
No comments:
Post a Comment