Tuesday, 8 September 2026

Lesson 1: Apply Theory - Newspaper Question One - Media Language Style Question

Typical Question Format:

 

Analyse the way that Media Language is used to present social contexts in Source A (The Daily Mail) and Source B (The Guardian Online).​ 

Apply Barthes Theories about Semiotics in your answer.

 

Context: You will be asked to write about social, cultural, political or historical context.

Theory: You will be asked to apply one of the following theorists

  • Apply Barthes Theories about semiotics.
  • Levi-Strauss theories about structuralism.
  • Todorov's theories about narratology.
  • Baudrillard's theories about Postmodernism.
  • Neale's theories about genre.
WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT CONTEXT?
 
SOCIAL CONTEXT

Social Context focuses on the different social groups being presented by the newspaper and what we are being encouraged to think about them. It will usually consider broad ideas such as gender, age and class, but may also consider ethnicity, race, disability, sexuality or other social groups. Think about which groups are being represented, how they are represented, and whether the newspaper presents them positively, negatively or neutrally.

Think about:

  • Which social groups are being represented?
  • What does the newspaper want us to think about that group?
  • Is the representation positive, negative or mixed?
  • Does the representation reflect wider social attitudes or tensions?

Simple question:

What is the newspaper saying about different groups of people?


CULTURAL CONTEXT

Cultural Context focuses on the beliefs, values and attitudes that exist within society and how the newspaper reflects or challenges them. It can include ideas about British identity, religion, tradition, family, morality, patriotism, popular culture and changing attitudes. Think about what the newspaper appears to believe is important, acceptable, normal or threatening.

Think about:

  • What values and beliefs does the newspaper appear to promote?
  • What does it present as right or wrong, normal or abnormal?
  • How does it represent ideas about British identity or national identity?
  • Does it support traditional values or challenge them?
  • Are there particular cultural attitudes or beliefs that its audience is expected to share?

Simple question:

What values does the newspaper suggest are important, right, wrong or normal?


POLITICAL CONTEXT

Political Context focuses on the political ideas, events and issues. It is particularly important to consider who has political power, what political decisions are being made and where the newspaper stands politically. Think about how the newspaper's political viewpoint or ideology might affect the stories it chooses and the way it presents them. It is supporting a political party/perspective or is it challenging that party/perspective? 

Think about:

  • What political event or issue is the newspaper reporting?
  • Who has power and who is being criticised or supported?
  • What are the major political arguments or debates at the time?
  • What is the newspaper's political viewpoint or agenda?
  • How might the newspaper's political position influence its representation of the story?

Simple question:

What is happening politically, and whose side does the newspaper appear to be on?


HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Historical Context focuses on the events, developments and changes from the past that help us understand the significance of a newspaper story. Think about whether the story is connected to a longer-running issue, previous event or historical relationship, and whether the newspaper is relying on its audience knowing about that past. Historical context can therefore help explain why this particular story matters at this particular time and why it may be represented in a particular way.

Think about:

  • What is the historical significance of the story? Why does this event matter beyond what happened on that particular day?
  • Is the story part of a longer-running issue? For example, immigration, the NHS, the economy, Britain's relationship with Europe, or tensions between countries.
  • Are there important historical events or relationships behind the story? These may shape how readers understand the people or issues involved.
  • Has the situation changed over time? Consider whether the newspaper is presenting the story as evidence of progress, decline, crisis or change.
  • Does the newspaper use the past to influence how we judge the present? For example, by referring to previous governments, conflicts, scandals or historical events.

Simple question:

What does the past add to our understanding of this story?



QUESTION CONTEXT: 

On March 7th, 2021, Meghan Duchess of Sussex gave an Interview to Oprah Winfrey in which she accused the Royal Family of racism. This came just a few hours after the Queen's speech to the British Commonwealth in which she stressed the importance of duty.

 SOURCE A: DAILY MAILCOVER MARCH 8th 2021

SOURCE B: THE GUARDIAN ONLINE MARCH 8th 2021




















 

YOU MAY FIND IT EASIER TO USE THIS...

 

So, start by asking yourself the following questions...

Context (Social)

1: What social groups are being presented?

2: What is the messaging about those social groups?

Theorist (Barthes)

1: What myths are being presented as natural?

2: What ideological position do those myths seem to suggest are just common sense? 

 

SO, HOW DO WE ANSWER THE QUESTION

MARK SCHEME - YOUR SCORE FOR THIS QUESTION IS OUT OF 10

1. Correctly characterise the theory [0,1,2]​ 

Use the theory correctly, the right words and the right ideas. 

2. Answer the question [0,1,2]​  

Refer to the right elements of context or representation. e.g. If you're writing about social context, use the phrase social context.  

3. Use specific and detailed examples [0,1,2]​ 

Carefully select examples from the text to write about. There may be times when you approach it slightly differently, but as a rule of thumbs approach in this order:

i) Look at the main image and anchoring text.

ii) Look at the main headline and sub headline - consider typography and language

iii) Look at anything else of interest on the page

4. Uses the theory to analyse the examples [0,1,2]​

After you have presented the example, apply the theory to analyse it.

5. Use Media Studies terminology [0,1,2]

Finally, and throughout, try to use as much terminology that is specific to Media Studies as you are able. (You'll get better at this as you progress).

1. THEORY [0,1,2]​   

2. QUESTION [0,1,2]​ 

3. EXAMPLE [0,1,2]​   

4. ANALYSIS  [0,1,2]​

5. TERMINOLOGY [0,1,2]

 WHEN APPROACHING THE ESSAY, START BY IDENTIFYING THE THEORY AND THE CONTEXT. FOR EXAMPLE...

Barthes argues that signs create connotations which can construct myths, that make ideologies appear natural or common sense.  This can link to social context by reinforcing our expectations about different social groups. 

 The image and anchoring text on the cover of the Daily Mail constructs connotations around the social contexts of age, ethnicity and social hierarchy that reinforce the myth that Britain is morally superior and that the Queen is the ultimate example of this.  The image of the Queen uses direct address and eyeline matching, to connote connection with the British audience and the anchoring text indicates that she is making a speech to her subjects. This reinforces the myth that she is both our leader, but also one of us, which naturalises the Daily Mail’s patriotic ideological position. By contrast, the image of Meghan is a high angle shot, which may connote the idea that we are meant to look down on her. Her facial expression is smug and she is looking off camera, instead of connecting to the audience. This is combined with the anchoring text, ‘speaking out’ which is constructing the idea of her being so self absorbed that she is willing to share private matters in public. All of these elements combine to construct the myth that young, American celebrities are uncouth and beneath the British class system. This naturalises the patriotic and ethnocentric values of the Daily Mail and its readers. 

 Look at this example of the the first two paragraphs and apply the mark scheme. In the contents below, give it a grade.  

 

 

 

 

 


34 comments:

  1. 1. THEORY [2]​
    2. QUESTION [2]​
    3. EXAMPLE [2]​
    4. ANALYSIS [2]​
    5. TERMINOLOGY [2]
    10/10

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Barthes says that signs can create connotations which construct myths, these myths make ideologies seem as though they are common sense. This can also link the social context by engraining ideas about different social groups.
      The image that The Guardian used conveyed that both Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are equals, because of the fact the are at the same height and the are both at eyeline view, not just with each other, but with us too This deconstructs the idea that they should be separated by gender, because often women are shown as less important/powerful as men. As well as by race, as Meghan is often depicted as the villain because she is American, and Americans are seemingly beneath the British class system. The anchoring text makes the two seem as though they are not deserving of hate, especially due to their class, as this event allowed many people to see that discrimination can happen in any social class, including royalty. The text underneath the photo shows the difference in opinion of Meghan from a few famous names, including Serena Williams and Piers Morgan. Barthes’ theory of semiotics is therefore used in this scenario to construct the myth of equality between the two, hoping to allow people to see the similarities between the royals and us.

      Delete
  2. Lewis and Sonny
    Theory: 2
    Question: 1
    Example: 2
    Analysis: 2
    Terminology: 2
    Overall: 9/10
    Feedback: it strays away from social context at some points but when it does it is very on topic. However, overall it is clearly writing and analysing social context in the sources.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lewis
      In media, a theorist named Barthes contests that signs are used to create connotations which construct myths and make ideologies appear as common sense. You can link Barthes theory to social context by reinforcing our ideas about expectations on different social groups.

      In the Guardian newspaper, Prince Harry and Princess Meghan are sitting at eye level with us which creates a connotation that they are equals to us. However, because they aren’t looking at us it might connote that they are still above us due to them being royals but the fact they keep their body language open means they still allow themselves to be equals with us. The heading of the Guardian connotes that the royals, despite being higher up than the public, still look for the public's approval. This makes them seem on an equal level to the public because in every action we do, we look to seek praise from other individuals.

      Delete
  3. Omar-Zion Smith 10/10 - I believe this is a perfect opening paragraph on how to structure the answer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The photos on the cover of the daily mail are used to represent differences in social hierarchy between the queen and meghan markle. Where the queen is used to portray the myth of traditional british beliefs regarding moral superiority, meghan is used to deconstrust the myth as she represents left wing values of equality, social justice and solidarity. This challenges the daily mails patriotic political position so here meghan is critiqued by the daily mail. However in the guardians photo, meghan is at an eye level shot as she smiles away from the camera and gazes towards her husband. This shows unity between the couple as well as readers watching. The guardian does not believe in patriotism but instead highly values equality and social justice and meghan is used as a signifier in this image to help portray this.

      Delete
  4. katie bennett
    1) theory (2)
    2)questions(2)
    3)examples (2)
    4)analysis (2)
    5)terminology(2)
    10/10

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Katie-
      The social context which is conveyed by the image and anchoring text of the Guardian connotes the idea of equality between classes, genders, ethnicity and social background that questions the idea that Britain is superior to other races. This image challenges this as both Meghan and Harry are eyeline matched to one another. Also this specific picture is mise en scene so the body language of the two can easily be seen by the audience. This is significant because of the different races, genders and born social class between the two. In a patriarchal society a woman would be below a man. This would further be true by the fact that Meghan is not a born royal unlike Harry and the fact that Meghan is an American. All this signifies that they see each other as equal despite the social differences between them. The anchoring text then adds the idea that the "most prominent defenders were in the US" conveying the idea that the US is more supportive of equality and globalism compared to the UKs more traditional views.

      Delete
  5. Rufus 1. 2/2 theory 2. 2/2 question 3. 2/2 example 4. 1/2 analysis 5. 2/2 terminology overall 9/10. it addresses and explains the context of the image, and also the social contexts of the cover. it uses media language skills, explaining the choice of camera angle uses from the daily mail, and explains that the newspaper takes a right leaning political standpoint, evident in the choice of angle and patriotic language. One way to improve this answer, is by providing a counter argument/point of view, to further reinforce the answer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Guardian Image and anchoring text, addresses social contexts of ethnicity, gender and royal status. We are presented with Prince Harry and Princess Meghan, at an eye level camera shot, and we see them gazing into one another's eyes. This technical code connotes that despite their royal status and power, they are still a typical married couple, and are equal to everybody else. In addition to this, in the anchoring text, we see quotes from Serena Williams, another successful black woman, showing her overwhelming support for Meghan amidst the claims of racism that she had faced. We understand that the Guardian is a left leaning paper, therefore does not typically parade about patriotism and unconditional support for the royal family, which is evident in highlighting support for Meghan throughout the article. Therefore we can conclude from this that The Guardian is presenting these social contexts as injustices that need to be resolved within society.

      Delete
    2. theory: 1
      question: 2
      example: 2
      analysis: 2
      terminology: 1
      8/10

      Delete
  6. Artur Curado - theory - 2, question - 2, example -2, analysis -2, terminology -2 10/10

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The theory of Barthes affirms that signs create connotations which can construct myths, that make ideologies appear natural or common sense. This can link to social context by reinforcing our expectations about different social groups. the image and anchoring text of the Guardian online don't constructs around the social context of age, ethnicity and social hierarchy giving the newspaper a very neutral position. In the image of Harry and Meghan it is possible to see that they are looking to each other and in a similar pose, in a long shot, to connote that the prince and the duchess are in the same level. The anchoring text demonstrate that the couple has been praised and criticise. This anchoring text creates the myth that both opinions about the couple are accepted. All those elements combined create the myth that the social hierarchy, is not really important. Not naturalising the traditional patriarchal and ethnocentric values.

      Delete
  7. Daisy-
    1. THEORY 2
    2. QUESTION 1
    3. EXAMPLE 2
    4. ANALYSIS 2
    5. TERMINOLOGY 2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The image in the Guardian online suggests how Harry and Meghan are not relating up to the standard of the British Monarchy. This is presented by how the couple are both looking away from the camera and towards each other. the fact that the Guardian had selected a mid-body shot shows that the couple could be relating more due to being fully in-view, this may also be suggesting how she is not able to fit in with the patriarchal views. However this creates a sense where she’s not always being the Princess and aligning with the views of being proper all the time and instead is relating more towards the people of Britain. The threat of a “culture war” in the anchoring text suggests.. (don’t know what else to add)

      Delete
  8. Leticia Pinto Muller
    1 theory - 2
    2 question - 2
    3 example - 2
    4 analysis- 2
    5 terminology - 2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The image and anchoring text in the article from The Guardian Online constructs connotations about the social context, including class, gender and ethnicity, the picture brings the couple, which are both different genders and ethnicities, the medium shot makes them look equals, their similar poses and the eye contact brings a sense of equality, not reinforcing the myth of the British tradicionalism as does the Daily Mail, making Meghan , a woman of different nacionality and race seem equal to Harry, a Royal British man.

      Delete
  9. Evie Pidduck-
    Theory[2]
    Question[1]
    Example[2]
    Analysis[2]
    Terminology[2]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Barthes argues that signs create connotations which can construct myths, that make ideologies appear natural or common sense. This can link to social groups and the way they are represented.

      The image used in the Guardian highlights the relationship dynamic between Harry and Meghan and shows they see each other as equal as they are looking at each other at the same eye level. This contradicts the stereotypical norms between men and woman as men are usually seen to be superior due to the patriarchy (especially in this case as Harry is royal blood). The photo therefore exaggerates they are both in a happy healthy relationship as there are connotations of romantic love. The reader feels connected to the couple as they are neither at a high or low angle which signifies equality even though they are in a much higher social class. The anchoring text suggests the piece is from a place of praise and not judgement.

      Delete
    2. -Theory - 2/2
      -Question - 1/2
      -Example - 1/2
      -Analysis - 2/2
      Terminology - 1/2

      Delete
  10. Rodrigo Vidal Santos

    theory - 2
    question - 2
    example - 2
    analysis - 2
    terminology - 2

    10/10

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The image and anchoring text on the cover of the The Guardian perfectly shows just how split British society is when it comes to the Royal Family.
      The photo of Harry and Meghan during the interview gives off a real sense of vulnerability. The paper tries to look neutral at first, with a headline about them drawing both "praise and vitriol," but it straight away calls the whole thing a "culture war." This completely breaks down the myth that Britain is a polite, united country, and shows everyone just how divided it actually is.
      The article also points out this massive divide by looking at the public. It mentions that older people and Brexit supporters mostly hated the interview, whereas younger people and women of colour backed Meghan.
      At the end of the day, the way The Guardian pieces the text and image together serves to dismantle the perfect image of the establishment. It highlights how the traditional British class system is hostile towards outsiders—especially a biracial American woman who decided to speak out—which completely aligns with the paper's own progressive worldview.

      Delete
  11. Sonny (didnt work last time)
    Theory: 2
    Question: 1
    Example: 2
    Analysis: 2
    Terminology: 2
    Overall: 9/10
    Feedback: it strays away from social context at some points but when it does it is very on topic. However, overall it is clearly writing and analysing social context in the sources.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sonny
      Barthes argues that connotations are created by signs. Connotations can construct myths, that make ideologies appear common sense. This can link to the social context by reinforcing the publics expectations about different social groups or classes.

      The image and anchoring text on the cover of the Guardian online constructs connotations around the social context of age and social hierarchy that subvert the idea/ myth that the elites are morally superior and that the royal family is the ultimate example of this. The image of the duke and duchess of sussex has the subjects level with the reader in a relaxed position, to connote equality with the audience and to present them as relatable to readers. The anchoring text indicates that Prince Harry and Princess Megan have recieved both love and praise, but also hate and criticism. This breaks down the myth that they are superior in every way and instead promotes the idea that they are not only capable of receiving criticism but also one of us in the sense that they arent these perfect figureheads of the country, loved by all, which naturalises the Gaurdians liberal ideological position. The mid shot shows their body language, having them on equal level eye to eye may connote the idea that despite the fact that he is a royal by blood and she is an american celebrity, they still see eachother as equals. They are both looking off camera, instead of engaging with the audience however their open body language still suggests a connection with the reader, not a complete separation. This is combined with the anchoring text, ‘prominent defeners’ which is constructing the idea of them being willing to share private matters in public and speak out against injustice and prejudice.

      Delete
    2. Th - 2. Q - 1. E - 2. A - 2. Te - 2. OVR - 9

      Delete
  12. However, The Guardians use of imagery and anchoring text construct connotations around the social context of gender, Ethnicity and race, which reinforce the myth that both British people and Non-British people are allowed to co-exist without judgement, the prime example of this being Meghan and Harry. Firstly, in the image used withing the article both Meghan and Harrys eyeline are placed at the same level to connote their love and equality despite their differences in character, along with the anchoring text of the image highlighting their life as partners together.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Barthes argues that signs create connotations which can construct myths, that make ideologies appear natural or common sense. This can link to social context by reinforcing our expectations about different social groups.

    The image shown by the daily mail shows the social construct between Harry and Meghan by presenting them as equals using eyeline match which overturns traditional patriarchal views placed on women especially in the royal family, this removes any sexism which may have been portrayed before. Them being equal also destroys racial prejudice as she is a mixed race women and is viewed as neither below or above a white male. The anchoring text stems from a place of tribute, allowing the clear connection of the mid shot to convey the story rather than a sense of judgment. Harry and Mehgan looking at each other rather than us the reader connotes to the privacy and normalcy of their relationship even as they are under scrutiny as royals.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Nadia -
    The image conveys connotations of social contexts between Harry and Meghan in the Oprah Winfrey interview. This is shown through the eyeline match shot, which shows the equality between Harry, Meghan and the public. The image is polysemic as it shows the couple's vulnerability (through their nervous hand gestures). However, the image also connotes power through discussing issues, such as racism. As well as this, Harry and Meghan have eye contact which exemplifies their strong bond despite being of a different gender and ethnicity. Ultimately, The Guardian goes against the ideology of the British being morally superior, as it shows Harry and Meghan as equals.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Evie Pidduck
    Theory-[2]
    Question-[2]
    Example-[2]
    Analysis-[2]
    Terminology-[1]

    ReplyDelete
  16. rosie ansell - halford
    1. 1/'2
    2.1/2
    3.2/2
    4.1/2
    5.2/2

    ReplyDelete
  17. Holly Adams
    1. THEORY [2]​

    2. QUESTION [2]​

    3. EXAMPLE [2]​

    4. ANALYSIS [2]​

    5. TERMINOLOGY [2]

    10/10

    ReplyDelete
  18. Arthur
    1/2
    1/2
    2/2
    2/2
    2/2
    7/10

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Posted in the wrong one. my bad

      Delete