Political Context

Political Context Question:

Mark Scheme 

1. Clearly answers the question - QUESTION [0,1,2]

2. Has a coherent argument throughout - COHERENT [0,1,2] 

3. Uses a wide range of specific and detailed examples - EXAMPLES [0,1,2]

4. Analyses/Interprets every example - ANALYSE/INTERPRET [0,1,2]

5. Writes like a Media Studies student - TERMINOLOGY [0,1,2]

 

How do political contexts shape the way newspapers represent events, issues, and individuals?  Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. 

Introduction: This could work for Historical, Cultural or Political context

The Daily Mail and The Guardian are both national institutions whose historical, cultural and political significance were established at their inception and have hardly changed over the last two centuries. The Guardian was founded in 1821 in response to the Peterloo massacre. It's liberal founders intended the paper to provide a voice for the marginalised and to hold the powerful to account. It has maintained its reputations for journalistic integrity and rigour ever since. Today, while it does still have an excellent reputation for largely unbiased journalism, it does also face some criticism for its tendency to support more left wing political positions. By contrasts, The Daily Mail, is unabashedly right leaning and conservative in its messaging and has been since its founding in 1896. In the 130 years since its first publication its owners and editors have maintained the stance that it does not actively support any political party, but rather that it serves its middle class readership, whose views have tended to align with the Conservative party. It is and has always been a politically populist publication and this has shaped its response to the representations of individuals, ideas and events.

SECTION 1: BREXIT 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemies_of_the_people_(headline)#/media/File:Daily_Mail_-_Enemies_of_the_People.png 

The three judges who 'blocked Brexit' | Daily Mail Online

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwXl1s9XgAQl8sH?format=jpg&name=large

1st, Mark the example in the comments section.

2nd, Write your own example and then post in the comments section.

SECTION 2: COVID

 

 

 

NEWSPAPERS QUESTION 3: CONTEXT

Context in Newspaper Study: A Level Media Studies

When studying newspapers at A Level Media Studies, it is essential to understand the different contextual factors that influence their editorial content, audience engagement, and the broader societal implications of their reporting. These factors—political, historical, social, cultural, economic, and technological—help explain why newspapers adopt certain editorial positions, how they engage with their audiences, and how they have adapted to the changing media landscape over time. By analysing these contexts, students gain insight into how newspapers both shape and are shaped by the world they report on.

---

Political Context

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: Q3 - POLITICAL CONTEXT - 5 Questions

The political context of newspapers refers to how they align with or challenge particular political ideologies and frameworks. Newspapers do not simply report the news objectively; they interpret and present it in ways that are often influenced by political bias or institutional power. In this sense, newspapers serve not just as information providers but as ideological apparatuses, shaping public discourse around key political issues. By analysing political context, students learn how media outlets contribute to the construction of political identities and reflect the values of particular political groups, whether liberal, conservative, or radical.

• The Guardian is widely recognised for its left-liberal political orientation, advocating for progressive causes such as social justice, environmental protection, and government accountability. Its editorial stance frequently challenges neoliberal economic policies, highlighting issues of wealth inequality, corporate corruption, and the erosion of civil liberties. The Guardian often positions itself as a counter-hegemonic force, using investigative journalism to hold power structures to account and provide voice to marginalised groups. This reflects a commitment to democratic ideals, in line with theorists like Stuart Hall, who argue that media plays a central role in shaping and challenging dominant ideologies.

• The Daily Mail, in contrast, aligns itself with conservative political positions, often advocating for nationalism, traditional family values, and economic individualism. The paper’s stance on issues like immigration, national identity, and law and order reflects a more reactionary, right-wing view of society. Drawing on Antonio Gramsci's concept of cultural hegemony, the Daily Mail can be seen as reinforcing dominant power structures by promoting ideas that favour the political and economic establishment. It often uses populist rhetoric to frame political debates in binary terms, drawing sharp contrasts between the ‘ordinary people’ and ‘elites’, and thereby appealing to readers with more conservative, nationalist views.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE:

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: Political Context - Newspapers

---

Historical Context

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: Q 3: HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 QUESTIONS

The historical context of a newspaper refers to its development and the historical events that have influenced its editorial stance over time. Newspapers evolve in response to the broader political, economic, and social changes of their eras, and understanding these changes is critical for comprehending how newspapers have shaped, and been shaped by, key historical moments. This context allows students to explore the ongoing tension between newspapers as a reflection of society and newspapers as active participants in shaping public consciousness.

• The Guardian has a long history of advocating for progressive political causes, stemming from its origins in 1821 as The Manchester Guardian. Founded by John Edward Taylor, the newspaper emerged as a voice for liberal reformers during the Industrial Revolution, advocating for social justice, workers' rights, and transparency in government. Over the decades, The Guardian has covered numerous pivotal historical events, such as World War II, the civil rights movement, and the rise of neoliberal economic policies in the 1980s. The paper’s history reveals a commitment to independent, investigative journalism, cemented in the 21st century with landmark reports on the Snowden leaks and corporate tax avoidance.

• The Daily Mail was founded in 1896 by Alfred Harmsworth, a pioneer of mass-market journalism who aimed to appeal to a growing middle-class readership. Throughout the 20th century, the paper played a central role in shaping public opinion on political and social issues, often supporting conservative and nationalist causes. The historical trajectory of The Daily Mail reflects its commitment to defending traditional values and British identity, frequently engaging in moral panics around issues like immigration and national security. The paper's controversial support for fascism in the 1930s further complicates its historical position, highlighting its alignment with right-wing populist ideologies during certain periods.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: HISTORICAL CONTEXT - NEWSPAPER QUESTION

---

Social Context

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: Q3 - SOCIAL CONTEXT - 5 QUESTIONS

The social context of newspapers involves examining how they reflect, reinforce, or challenge the social issues and values of the time. A newspaper’s social role is shaped by the demographic characteristics and ideological preferences of its audience, and its content often reflects the concerns and anxieties of different social groups. By understanding the social context, students can identify how newspapers engage with issues such as class, race, gender, and identity, and how these issues are represented or constructed in the media.

• The Guardian primarily appeals to a liberal, educated, urban middle class. It reflects the values of progressive social movements, frequently covering topics such as climate change, gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and racial justice. The paper’s in-depth reporting on issues like feminism, systemic racism, and environmental activism engages a readership that seeks nuanced, socially conscious journalism. By adopting an activist tone, The Guardian positions itself as a platform for marginalised voices and a defender of social equity, aligning with broader liberal social trends.

• The Daily Mail, in contrast, caters to a more conservative and traditionally-minded readership. Many of its readers express concerns about rapid social change, particularly in relation to issues like immigration, crime, and family structures. The paper’s sensationalist approach to social issues often employs moral panic to frame problems such as youth culture, political correctness, or ‘welfare dependency’. It reinforces traditional gender roles and societal hierarchies, frequently portraying women in conventional domestic roles and focusing on the importance of family and national identity.

---

Cultural Context

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: Q3 - CULTURAL CONTEXT - 5 QUESTIONS

Cultural context examines the role of the media in constructing and disseminating cultural values, beliefs, and norms. Newspapers are not neutral in their representation of culture; they reflect and help reinforce the cultural ideologies of the time, whether by promoting dominant cultural norms or by challenging them. By analysing the cultural context of newspapers, students can explore how media outlets shape public perceptions of identity, morality, and national heritage.

• The Guardian often positions itself as a platform for intellectual critique of mainstream culture. Its coverage of the arts, literature, and cinema is informed by a commitment to diversity and inclusivity, reflecting progressive cultural values. The paper frequently critiques the commercialisation of culture and the dominance of mainstream celebrity culture, focusing instead on independent, alternative forms of cultural expression. This approach challenges traditional representations of gender, race, and class in the media, aligning with broader movements for social change.

• The Daily Mail engages with culture from a more populist and nationalist perspective, often celebrating mainstream culture and reinforcing traditional British values. The paper’s extensive coverage of celebrity gossip, royal affairs, and reality television reflects a preference for entertainment that appeals to nostalgia and the familiar. It often positions itself as a defender of traditional values against what it perceives as the excesses of ‘woke’ culture, political correctness, and progressive movements, framing cultural debates in terms of cultural preservation versus social change.

---

Economic Context - 2024 QUESTION WAS ON ECONOMIC CONTEXT

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: ECONOMIC CONTEXT NEWSPAPERS

The economic context of newspapers involves understanding the financial structures that influence how news is produced, distributed, and consumed. As businesses, newspapers must balance their editorial goals with the economic pressures of advertising revenue, circulation sales, and, increasingly, digital subscription models. The economic strategies of newspapers are closely tied to their political and social ideologies, with different financial models affecting their independence and editorial direction.

• The Guardian operates under a unique model, being owned by the Scott Trust, which ensures that it is free from the pressures of commercial ownership. This structure allows The Guardian to prioritise in-depth journalism, investigative reporting, and content that may not attract significant advertising revenue. However, the rise of digital media has presented financial challenges, and the newspaper has turned to reader subscriptions and donations as a means of sustaining its operations. While still relying on advertising revenue, The Guardian has been selective in accepting corporate sponsorship, particularly from companies whose activities contradict its environmental and social values.

• The Daily Mail follows a more traditional commercial model, relying heavily on advertising revenue, mass circulation, and the commercialisation of its online content through MailOnline. This model focuses on maximising reader engagement, using sensational headlines, celebrity gossip, and controversial topics to generate clicks and boost advertising income. Unlike The Guardian, which places emphasis on quality journalism, The Daily Mail leverages its high-volume readership to attract advertisers and maintain a more commercially-driven content strategy.

---

Technological Context: NB - THIS CONTEXT WILL NOT BE EXPLICIT

Chatham and Clarendon Media Studies Blog: CONTEXT - TECHNOLOGY - EXEMPLARY ESSAYS

Technological advances have had a profound impact on the way newspapers produce, distribute, and consume news. The shift from print to digital journalism has altered how newspapers reach their audience, with technological developments enabling the rise of online platforms, mobile apps, and social media. Understanding the technological context helps explain how newspapers adapt to changes in consumption habits and the financial pressures of the digital age.

• The Guardian has successfully navigated the digital transition by investing in its online presence and providing high-quality, interactive content. The newspaper’s website features multimedia elements, real-time updates, and extensive digital analysis, allowing it to cater to a global audience. Its digital strategy also includes a focus on long-form reporting, investigative journalism, and reader engagement through subscription models.

• The Daily Mail has embraced technology with a focus on mass-market appeal. MailOnline is one of the most visited English-language news websites globally, generating significant revenue through programmatic advertising and sponsored content. The website’s design is optimised for quick consumption, with a focus on eye-catching images and sensational headlines to attract readers. The paper also uses social media platforms to drive traffic and engage with a wider audience, capitalising on the rapid consumption of news in the digital age.

Q3 - CULTURAL CONTEXT - 5 QUESTIONS

1. How do cultural contexts shape the way newspapers represent national identity and heritage? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This encourages students to examine how ideas of Britishness, tradition, or multiculturalism are reflected and constructed by different newspapers.)

2. In what ways do cultural values influence the editorial tone and content priorities of newspapers? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This invites discussion on how deep-seated cultural beliefs—such as views on monarchy, art, or education—shape what is covered and how.)

3. How have shifts in cultural identity and attitudes influenced the way newspapers portray cultural institutions and practices? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This allows students to explore the press’s portrayal of elements like religion, the arts, or traditional celebrations through a cultural lens.)

4. To what extent does cultural context impact the use of language, symbolism, and imagery in newspaper reporting? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This question focuses on how newspapers use culturally coded language or references to connect with their readership.)

5. How do newspapers reflect and negotiate tensions between traditional cultural values and contemporary cultural trends? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This allows for analysis of how newspapers either resist or embrace changing cultural norms in areas such as gender roles, globalisation, or youth culture.)

How Do Newspapers Reflect and Negotiate Tensions Between Traditional Cultural Values and Contemporary Cultural Trends?

Newspapers function as both agents of representation and cultural institutions, negotiating between heritage and modernity. The Guardian constructs its identity through a liberal editorial stance and a historical commitment to holding power to account, often encoding progressive values within its content. In contrast, The Daily Mail maintains a populist editorial line, designed to position its largely middle-class, culturally conservative audience to favour tradition and national identity. Through their ideological framings, these newspapers reflect and mediate cultural tensions surrounding Brexit, LGBTQ+ rights, and globalised digital media, offering audiences differing preferred readings and inviting a variety of polysemic interpretations. 

---

Brexit and Cultural Division

The Brexit referendum became a powerful cultural flashpoint, dividing liberal internationalism from nationalist traditionalism. The Daily Mail’s “Enemies of the People” front page (4 Nov 2016), which vilified judges for ruling against the government’s unilateral triggering of Article 50, exemplifies sensationalist encoding. The paper’s representation of legal authority as treacherous reflects a right-wing ideological position, appealing to readers aligned with populist, anti-establishment views. The Guardian, by contrast, offered a counter-hegemonic narrative, upholding legal checks as vital to democracy. Its coverage offered an oppositional reading of the same event, positioning audiences to critique the government’s power grab and defend constitutionalism, while at the same time adopting a sober and matter-of-fact tone. These differences reveal how each paper reflects its ideological standpoint through framing strategies, shaping cultural meaning and reinforcing broader audience positioning within the Brexit debate. 

---

LGBTQ+ Rights and Shifting Morality

The representation of LGBTQ+ identities offers insight into each paper’s values and audience engagement. In April 2025, The Guardian reported on Judge Victoria McCloud’s appeal to the European Court of Human Rights after a UK Supreme Court ruling defined “sex” as biological in the Equality Act. The article was encoded to affirm legal protections for trans individuals, aligning with the paper’s progressive news values and inviting a preferred reading grounded in inclusion and diversity. The Daily Mail, however, often reinforces traditional moral codes. Its 2018 opinion piece opposing Tom Daley’s surrogacy choice reflects a conservative moral discourse, aligning with heteronormative family ideals. While such content may be read negotiatedly or oppositionally by more liberal readers, it clearly positions its core audience to resist shifting norms. These examples reveal how newspapers both reflect and shape cultural ideologies through mediated representations of gender and sexuality.

---

Social Media, Globalisation, and Cultural Consumption

The rise of platforms like TikTok marks a shift in how audiences access news and engage with cultural narratives. Ofcom’s 2023 report found that 28% of UK teens aged 12–15 access news primarily via TikTok (ITV, 2023). This shift towards user-generated content and participatory culture (Jenkins) signifies a break from traditional top-down models of communication. The Guardian has adapted by embracing convergent media practices, using interactive tools, live blogs, and mobile-optimised formats to position digitally literate users within a progressive news framework. Its editorial voice remains informed but accessible, encoding authority while encouraging community engagement. The Daily Mail, by contrast, has capitalised on the attention economy through Mail Online’s click-oriented model. Its use of soft news, clickbait headlines, and emotionally charged content reflects tabloid conventions and an emphasis on infotainment. While both papers operate within a globalised, digital culture, their contrasting media language and modes of address continue to reinforce distinct ideological alignments.

---

Conclusion

The Guardian and The Daily Mail illustrate how newspapers reflect and negotiate cultural tensions through their use of representation, ideology, framing, and audience positioning. Each uses distinctive media language and institutional practices to navigate shifts in cultural values—from Brexit nationalism to LGBTQ+ inclusion and digital globalisation. The Guardian offers a space for progressive, counter-hegemonic narratives, while The Daily Mail maintains a culturally conservative hegemonic discourse, appealing to its core readership. Their divergence not only mirrors Britain’s cultural divide but also highlights the complex role of the press in constructing and contesting meaning in contemporary society.

NEWSPAPERS - QUESTION 3 MARK SCHEME

USE THE FOLLOWING MARK SCHEME TO HELP STRUCTURE YOUR RESPONSES TO QUESTION 3 ON PAPER ONE, WHICH IS ALWAYS ABOUT CONTEXT APPLIED TO NEWSPAPERS.

1. Answer the question - Part 1 (Nail the Intro) [0,1,2]​     

Your introduction should establish a coherent central thesis which you return to throughout the essay.

2. Answer the question - Part 2 (Language of the question) [0,1,2]​ 

In every paragraph, repeat the key phrases in the question and refer back to the coherent core.

3. Use specific and detailed examples [0,1,2]​      

Specific and detailed means that few people in Ramsgate Highstreet would know the example.

4. Analyse/Interpret the example. [0,1,2]​

Offer up some analysis of the significance of the example, what does it suggest/indicate?

5. Use Media Studies terminology [0,1,2]

Encode, Decode, Messaging, Ideology etc.

Q3 - SOCIAL CONTEXT - 5 QUESTIONS

1.  How do social contexts shape the way newspapers represent events, issues, and individuals? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This directs students to analyse how contemporary social, cultural, and political issues influence news coverage.)
2. In what ways have social contexts influenced the editorial values and ideological positions of newspapers? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This encourages students to explore how factors such as shifting public attitudes, diversity, and social movements shape journalistic perspectives.)
3. How have social changes and media trends affected the relationship between newspapers and their audiences? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This prompts discussion on evolving reader expectations, audience engagement, and the impact of digital media.)
4. To what extent has social context shaped the overall tone and approach of newspaper reporting over time? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This asks students to consider how journalism has adapted to cultural shifts, political activism, and societal debates.)
5. How have social issues and public attitudes influenced the way newspapers construct narratives about key events and individuals? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This encourages students to analyse how topics such as gender, race, class, and activism impact media representation.)

How have social changes and media trends affected the relationship between newspapers and their audiences? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This prompts discussion on evolving reader expectations, audience engagement, and the impact of digital media.)

TASK: Look carefully at the essay below. It is at least twice (and possibly thrice) as long as you can write in 15 minutes. What would you keep and what would your remove? Take the whole essay and edit it so that it is a manageable size for you to write in 15 minutes.

The relationship between newspapers and their audiences has been profoundly reshaped by social changes and media trends, particularly through digital convergence, changing audience demographics, and the shift from passive consumption to active audience engagement. Both The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online have adapted their content strategies in response to evolving audience expectations, reflecting political discourse and representations of different social groups. By examining these developments, we can see how newspapers have navigated the rise of digital platforms and the changing ideological makeup of their readerships, while also addressing issues of race, sex, and sexuality in their coverage.

Rise of Digital Journalism

One of the most significant media trends affecting newspaper-audience relationships is the decline of print circulation and the shift towards online journalism. Over the past two decades, print newspapers have faced major challenges in maintaining readership due to the shift towards digital media consumption. For example, The Guardian’s average daily print circulation fell from 401,560 copies in January 2000 to 132,341 copies in January 2020. Similarly, The Daily Mail’s circulation dropped from 2,353,915 copies in January 2000 to 1,169,241 copies in January 2020, with both publications experiencing even sharper declines over the subsequent five years. In response, both have adopted digital-first strategies.

The Guardian implemented a subscription and donation-based model, reaching over one million recurring digital supporters by December 2021, more than half of whom are based outside the UK. This funding model allows readers to support independent journalism without encountering a paywall. By contrast, The Daily Mail has focused on ad-driven revenue and click-oriented content, leading to the prominence of sensationalist headlines and an emphasis on soft news. This strategy has been successful, with Mail Online attracting 157 million monthly visits by July 2021, making it one of the most visited news websites in the UK. These differing approaches reflect their distinct audience expectations: The Guardian caters to an informed, politically engaged readership, while The Daily Mail appeals to a mass-market audience seeking entertainment and populist news. Their stances on social issues similarly diverge, with The Guardian advocating for racial justice, LGBTQ+ rights, and gender equality, while The Daily Mail has faced criticism for coverage perceived as reinforcing conservative values.

Social Media and Participatory Culture (Jenkins)

According to media theorist Henry Jenkins, the rise of Web 2.0 and participatory culture has transformed the way audiences engage with media, making social media platforms key sites for news distribution. The traditional, top-down relationship between newspapers and their audiences has evolved into a two-way interaction, where readers can comment, share, and even shape discussions around news stories.

The Guardian has capitalised on this shift through interactive features such as live blogs, comment sections, and collaborative investigative journalism, strengthening its commitment to public service journalism and audience involvement. Conversely, The Daily Mail has utilised clickbait-style headlines and viral content strategies, particularly via Mail Online, to drive engagement. By focusing on celebrity culture, scandals, and polarising political issues, The Daily Mail has fostered an audience that actively shares and debates content, often reinforcing ideological echo chambers.

Political Polarisation and Changing Audience Demographics

Brexit

Social and political shifts have further influenced the evolving relationship between newspapers and their audiences. Political polarisation, exemplified by movements such as Brexit, has reinforced reader loyalty to outlets aligning with their ideological perspectives. The contrasting front pages of The Daily Mail and The Guardian on 4 November 2016 provide a clear example.

The Daily Mail’s infamous “Enemies of the People” front page portrayed High Court judges who ruled that Parliament must vote on triggering Article 50 as enemies of democracy. This sensationalist language not only reflected the paper’s right-wing stance but also strategically reinforced its pro-Brexit readership’s views, regardless of whether it fully aligned with the private views of key figures like editor Paul Dacre. In contrast, The Guardian reported the ruling in a more measured tone but simultaneously included a front-page editorial by Polly Toynbee, criticising Brexit as wreaking "havoc," thus revealing a left-leaning editorial bias. These differences show how editorial choices are influenced by audience expectations and political ideology.

Immigration

The ideological divide between The Guardian and The Daily Mail is starkly evident in their coverage of immigration. On 31 July 2015, The Daily Mail ran a front page with the headline “A Swarm on Our Streets,” referring to migrants entering Britain. The language of "swarm" dehumanises migrants, framing immigration as a threat to national security and British identity. This sensationalist narrative appeals to an older, more conservative readership concerned with immigration control and national sovereignty.

In contrast, The Guardian’s front page on 25 November 2021 bore the headline “Tragedy at Sea Claims 31 Lives in Deadliest Day of Refugee Crisis," covering the deaths of migrants attempting to cross the English Channel. This humanitarian framing emphasised the personal tragedies behind migration, holding governments accountable for human rights obligations and resonating with a younger, left-leaning audience supportive of refugee protections.

These contrasting framings reflect each newspaper’s ideological position and the values of their respective audiences.

Gender and Sexuality

Both newspapers also mirror shifting social attitudes towards gender and sexuality. The Guardian regularly features coverage on gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and feminist perspectives, fostering inclusive discourse and advocating for progressive social change. Meanwhile, The Daily Mail has often been criticised for its sensationalist and objectifying portrayal of women, particularly through its "Sidebar of Shame," which spotlights the appearances of female celebrities. However, recognising social change, The Daily Mail has begun featuring more stories highlighting gender identity debates and the achievements of women in leadership, albeit frequently through a more critical or reactionary lens.

Conclusion

The evolving relationship between newspapers and their audiences is shaped by digital transformation, changing societal values, and the rise of participatory media cultures. The Guardian has fostered an interactive, community-supported readership aligned with progressive journalism, while The Daily Mail has maximised digital engagement through mass-market, sensationalist content strategies. Their differing representations of immigration, gender, and sexuality continue to shape audience perceptions, reinforcing ideological divisions within British society. These developments demonstrate the complex ways that newspapers adjust their strategies to maintain audience loyalty amid rapid technological, political, and cultural transformations.

Q3 - POLITICAL CONTEXT - 5 Questions

WE ARE GOING TO WORK ON THE FIRST OF THESE TOGETHER, BUT YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO ANSWER ALL FIVE.

1. Explain how political contexts influence individual producers within the newspaper industry. Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. 

2. How do political contexts shape the way newspapers represent events, issues, and individuals?  Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. 

3. In what ways does political context influence the editorial choices made by newspapers? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. 

4. How does political context affect the relationship between newspapers and their audiences? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. 

5. To what extent does political context shape the overall tone and approach of newspaper reporting? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. 

AN INTRODUCTION ???

Here is a possible introduction. Read it carefully. What are the core ideas that it is introducing?

Individual newspapers may be influenced by a variety of political contexts: from the political affiliation of individual publications, to the ideology of the target audience, to the influence of ownership. The Daily Mail’s messaging is right wing but seems to be most concerned with audience engagement. The Guardian is perceived as left wing but seems to be influenced more by journalistic integrity and an attempt to foster a reputation for political neutrality. 

Paragraph 1: Response to Brexit (Audience Capture)

The most significant political event in the last 25 years is probably the Brexit vote. 

Look at the following evidence:

Does it support what is being suggested by the introduction?

Do we need to change anything?

Enemies of the People (headline) - Wikipedia

Daily_Mail_4_11_2016_400.jpg (398×520)

CwXl1s9XgAQl8sH (1348×2048) (twimg.com)

EXAMPLE PARAGRAPH

According to a 2017 YouGov poll, The Daily Mail is seen as the most right-wing of mainstream newspapers. However, it’s writers likely see its political messaging as providing a hegemonic preferred reading for the political values of its mainstream middle-class readership. Many publications took an oppositional reading of The Mail’s infamous ‘ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE’ (November 4^th 2016) cover, seeing it as stridently right wing, but the individual producers (writer James Slack and editor Paul Dacre) intended to be supportive of their readership’s pro-Brexit stance. The Guardian’s cover of the same day was more measured in its reporting, presenting a factual account of the judicial ruling. However, the cover did feature a call out to Polly Toynbe’s op-ed about Brexit wreaking ‘havoc.’ The Guardian is not averse to presenting left wing views, but the paper acknowledges that this is Toynbe’s opinion, not that of The Guardian, thereby defending its political neutrality and reputation for journalistic integrity. The contrasting coverage of the same event demonstrates how audience expectations, and ideological positioning of individual publication can shape editorial decisions within the newspaper industry.

TASK 1: 20 mins

In the comments section below, write a paragraph the begins with the topic sentence above and uses the evidence that we have reviewed.

TASK 2: Now use the mark scheme to grade the three paragraphs that follow yours. Format like this: Answer 1 [  ], Answer 2 [  ], Example [  ], Analyse [  ], Terminology [  ] = Total [  ]

Paragraph 2: The importance of Ownership (Daily Mail)

According to Curran and Seaton, the most important factor shaping the content of newspapers is ownership. If they are correct, the political bias of Viscount Rothermere will significantly effect the content of the paper. 

Look at the following evidence (or look over the Curran and Seaton ppt):

Does it support what is being suggested by the introduction?

Do we need to change anything?

Viscount Rothermere: The Lord of Middle England | The Independent | The Independent

Daily_Mail_5_1_2021_400.jpg (398×520) (thepaperboy.com)

EXAMPLE PARAGRAPH 2.

According to Curran and Seaton, the most important factor shaping the content of newspapers is ownership. If they are correct, the political bias of Viscount Rothermere will significantly effect the content of The Daily Mail. However, in a 2004 interview with the Independent Newspaper, Rothermere pointed out that the Conservative Party “do not have a God given right to expect the loyalty of the Daily Mail.” While this article is almost 20 years old, it was still demonstrably true in 2021, when the January 5^th cover selected a foolish image of Conservative PM Boris Johnson and raised concerns that lockdown would impact middle class readers by removing their access to education for their children, to middle class leisure activities like golf and tennis. It seems clear from this cover that  appealing to the cultural concerns of its audience are more significant that political affiliations or Rothermere's own viewpoints. In fact, Rothermere has stated that it would be “unfair” to put his “views into the public arena” and to risk unduly influencing his editor Paul Dacre.  Instead Dacre is given the freedom to excite audience engagement, reinforcing the idea that the Daily Mail’s core principle is to appeal to the values of its readers rather than to adhere to any specific political agenda.

Paragraph 3: The importance of Ownership (The Guardian)

Paradoxically, The Guardian agree with Curran and Seaton's analysis that Billionaire owners unduly influence the political content of their publications, but resist this process by virtue of their 'ownership' by the Scott Trust. 

Look at the following evidence (or look over the Curran and Seaton ppt):

Does it support what is being suggested by the introduction?

Do we need to change anything?

Eq66vsNW4AQHsj6 (965×1200)

Stephen Lawrence's parents thank Daily Mail for 'going out on a limb' | Daily Mail | The Guardian

Corbyn sabotaged Labour’s remain campaign. He must resign | Phil Wilson | The Guardian

EXAMPLE PARAGRAPH 3

Paradoxically, The Guardian agrees with Curran and Seaton's analysis that billionaire owners unduly influence the political content of their publications but resists this process through its ownership by the Scott Trust. At one point, the Guardian website invited readers to donate, claiming: “With no billionaire owner, we are committed to journalism defined by truth, rigour, and integrity.” This statement implicitly critiques the idea that billionaire ownership constrains editorial independence, suggesting that it leads to a narrowing of political perspectives. While The Guardian is often associated with left-wing politics, its reporting is frequently more nuanced. For instance, on the same day that The Daily Mail vilified Johnson’s decision to enter a second lockdown, The Guardian framed him as a patriotic leader, using visual cues like British flags to encode a sense of national pride. This exemplifies how The Guardian’s ownership structure enables a more politically independent approach, allowing it to maintain its commitment to impartial, nuanced journalism.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE: How does this differ from the first example?

Individual newspapers may be influenced by a variety of political contexts: from the political affiliation of individual publications, to the ideology of the target audience, to the influence of ownership. The Daily Mail’s messaging is right wing but seems to be most concerned with audience engagement. The Guardian is perceived as left wing but seems to be influenced more by journalistic integrity and an attempt to foster a reputation for political neutrality.

According to a 2017 YouGov poll, The Daily Mail is seen as the most right-wing of mainstream newspapers. However, it’s writers likely see its political messaging as providing a hegemonic preferred reading for the political values of its mainstream middle-class readership. Many publications took an oppositional reading of The Mail’s infamous ‘ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE’ (November 4^th 2016) cover, seeing it as stridently right wing, but the individual producers (writer James Slack and editor Paul Dacre) intended to be supportive of their readership’s pro-Brexit stance. The Guardian’s cover of the same day was more measured in its reporting, presenting a factual account of the judicial ruling. However, the cover did feature a call out to Polly Toynbe’s op-ed about Brexit wreaking ‘havoc.’ The Guardian is not averse to presenting left wing views, but the paper acknowledges that this is Toynbe’s opinion, not that of The Guardian, thereby defending its political neutrality and reputation for journalistic integrity.

While The Guardian remains somewhat politically neutral, both publications have strong ties to their support of Labour (The Guardian) and Conservatives (Daily Mail). However, this party-political context doesn’t override the core values of the papers. On January 5^th 2021, the front cover of The Daily Mail selected an unflattering image of Boris Johnson, and complained about the loss of freedom for its middle class readers as Britain embarked on a second lockdown. Clearly, it was more committed to its support of the middle-class values of its reader than its party affiliation. Again, audience engagement seems to be the most significant of The Daily Mail’s values. On the same day, The Guardian was far more supportive of Johnson, framing him as a patriotic leader, using visual cues like British flags to encode a sense of national pride, and selecting an image that represented him as weighed down by responsibility and honest about the difficulties ahead. Yet again, The Guardian seemed to prioritise political neutrality and journalistic integrity as its core value.

Curran and Seaton would argue that ownership is the most significant factor influencing media industries. Rupert Murdoch, the billionaire owner of News Corps is infamous for his control of the political messaging of his publications; but what of The Guardian and The Mail? The Guardian is owned by The Scott Trust Ltd, a company created to ensure that The Guardian would have ‘No Billionaire Owner’ (a fact that they share on their homepage). They maintain that this gives them the freedom to prioritise journalistic integrity without the political influence of a powerful owner. Conversely, DMGT is owned by the 4th Viscount Rothermere, a billionaire owner. However, in a 2004 interview with the Independent, he asserted that he keeps his political opinions out of the ‘public arena’ in order to ensure that his editor (Paul Dacre) is not unduly influenced. Dacre is given the freedom to excite audience engagement, reinforcing the ideas that the Daily Mail’s core principal is to appeal to the ideology of its readers rather than reinforcing party political messaging.

Q 3: HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 QUESTIONS

1. Explain how historical contexts have influenced individual producers within the newspaper industry. Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This encourages students to explore how past events, traditions, or industry shifts have shaped journalists and editors.)
2. How do historical contexts shape the way newspapers represent events, issues, and individuals? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This directs students to analyse how past social, economic, and media trends impact coverage of contemporary stories.)
3. In what ways have historical contexts influenced the editorial values and ideological positions of newspapers? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This makes students think about how long-standing ideologies or past editorial decisions continue to shape reporting.)
4. How have historical events and media traditions affected the relationship between newspapers and their audiences? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This encourages discussion of shifting reader demographics, evolving trust in journalism, and changes in media consumption habits.)
5. To what extent has historical context shaped the overall tone and approach of newspaper reporting over time? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This asks students to track how journalistic styles and priorities have evolved due to historical shifts.)

BELOW IS A RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION. LOOK CAREFULLY AT THE MENU OF DIFFERENT EXAMPLES. BREXIT SHOULD DEFINITELY BE PART OF YOUR LIST OF EXAMPLES, BUT PIC ONE OR TWO OTHERS.

NB: CHECK YOUR SOURCES CAREFULLY

How do historical contexts shape the way newspapers represent events, issues, and individuals? Refer to The Guardian/Guardian Online and The Daily Mail/Mail Online to support your answer. (This directs students to analyse how past social, economic, and media trends impact coverage of contemporary stories.)

Newspapers don't just report the news, they construct narratives shaped by historical contexts, ideological traditions, and long-standing editorial values. Both The Guardian and The Daily Mail have been shaped by their historical foundations, and their coverage of key events, such as:

• Brexit
• COVID-19 pandemic, 
• the death of Queen Elizabeth II
•  conflicts like the war in Afghanistan

reflects their ideological legacies. Examining how these newspapers represent events, issues, and individuals within these contexts reveals how historical influences continue to define British press coverage.

YOUR RESPONSE SHOULD DEFINITELY INCLUDE THIS INTRODUCTION, BUT THEN SHOULD CHOOSE ANY TWO OF THE OTHER TWO PARAGRAPHS.

INTRODUCTION

Both The Guardian and The Daily Mail were founded in historical circumstances that inform their editorial perspectives. The Guardian, established in 1821 was created in response to the Peterloo Massacre and has traditionally supported liberal, progressive politics, emphasising human rights, democracy, and social reform. In contrast, The Daily Mail, founded in 1896 targeted Britain’s growing middle class, championing right-wing populism, nationalism, and strong support for the British monarchy and military. These historical leanings shape how both newspapers cover major events, often leading to very different representations of the same issue, with The Guardian favouring liberal messaging and journalist integrity, and The Mail favouring a populist approach appealing to the values of their right-wing, middle class, readers.

BREXIT

One of the most historically significant events in Britain’s modern press history is the reporting around Brexit. The Daily Mail’s infamous “Enemies of the People” front page (4 November 2016) is a striking example of how newspapers draw on historical narratives to shape public perception. By portraying the judges who ruled that Parliament must vote on triggering Article 50 as threats to democracy, The Daily Mail evoked a long-standing tradition in British journalism of framing the judiciary as obstructing the "will of the people." This reflects the paper’s populist, right-leaning stance, but also echoes historical tensions between the press, the courts, and democratic governance. It is also likely that the incendiary language was not solely reflective of Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre’s personal views but was designed to resonate with a right wing readership historically inclined to distrust elite institutions. In contrast, The Guardian presented the same ruling in a more measured manner, consistent with its historical tradition of supporting constitutional checks and balances. Its front page on the same day avoided inflammatory language, instead reporting the judges' decision as part of due legal process. However, the inclusion of Polly Toynbee’s op-ed describing Brexit as wreaking “havoc” illustrates how The Guardian, despite its commitment to journalistic impartiality, has long aligned with progressive, reformist viewpoints in times of constitutional crisis. The contrasting coverage of the same event reflects how newspapers, shaped by their historical legacies, construct narratives that resonate with their ideological traditions and audience expectations.

DEATH OF THE QUEEN

The passing of Queen Elizabeth II in September 2022 was a moment of national significance, and the front pages of The Guardian and The Daily Mail offered strikingly different visual and editorial responses. The Daily Mail, known for its traditionalist and monarchist leanings, featured a nostalgic and patriotic front cover on September 9, 2022, with an image of the young Queen smiling playfully. This choice evoked a sense of national pride and sentimental reflection, aligning with the paper’s longstanding celebration of British heritage and monarchy. In contrast, The Guardian adopted a much more restrained approach. Its front page displayed only the dates of the Queen’s reign beneath a polysemic image of the newly crowned and enthroned queen, offering no anchoring text or explicit emotional framing. This minimalist design may have encouraged a more personal or ambiguous interpretation by its readership (whether reverent, critical, or neutral) reflecting The Guardian's broader commitment to journalistic objectivity and its more diverse, questioning stance toward the institution of monarchy. Additionally, The Guardian published articles reflecting on Britain’s colonial past and how the Queen’s reign intersected with decolonisation, an angle less likely to be explored by The Daily Mail, given its historic alignment with British imperial nostalgia.

NB: BEWARE CHAT GPT - IT IS YOUR FRIEND BUT MAY ALSO BE A LIAR. LOOK BELOW AT THE TWO COVERS. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY?

COVID PANDEMIC

The COVID-19 pandemic was another event where historical contexts shaped newspaper representation, particularly in relation to government response and public trust. The Guardian, consistent with its tradition of holding power to account, critically examined the UK government's handling of the crisis. On April 1, 2020, it published an article titled "Virus patients more likely to die may have ventilators taken away," highlighting ethical concerns and resource shortages as outlined by the British Medical Association. Additionally, The Guardian extensively reported on the inequalities exposed by the pandemic, such as the disproportionate impact on ethnic minorities and working-class communities, aligning with its long-standing liberal news agenda. In contrast, The Daily Mail, traditionally supportive of Conservative governments, initially rallied behind Boris Johnson’s leadership. On March 24, 2020, its front page headline "Lockdown Britain" marked the announcement of nationwide restrictions, reinforcing a narrative of unity and resilience. However, on January 5, 2021, as Johnson announced a second lockdown, The Daily Mail selected an unflattering image of the Prime Minister and expressed concerns about the loss of freedoms, particularly affecting its middle-class readership. This shift in tone reflected the paper's populist approach, echoing the values and frustrations of its audience.

WAR IN AFGHANISTAN

Coverage of the conflict in Afghanistan, particularly during the fall of Kabul in 2021, further illustrates how historical contexts shape newspaper representation. The Guardian, with its legacy of critical reporting on military interventions, framed the withdrawal of Western forces as a failure of foreign policy. Its front page on August 17, 2021, carried the headline “Chaos in Kabul as thousands struggle to flee the Taliban,” focusing on the humanitarian crisis and the consequences for Afghan civilians. It also published critical analyses of how historical Western interventions, particularly the 2001 invasion, contributed to long-term instability in the region. In contrast, The Daily Mail, which has historically championed the British military and emphasized patriotism in wartime coverage, framed the withdrawal differently. On August 17, 2021, its front page headline “Biden: It's Afghans' own fault” highlighted criticism of U.S. President Joe Biden’s handling of the exit, emphasizing perceived leadership failures rather than offering a broader critique of military intervention. This aligns with The Daily Mail’s historical approach of supporting military engagement while focusing blame on political figures when conflicts end unsuccessfully.

Historical contexts profoundly shape how newspapers represent events, issues, and individuals. The Guardian and The Daily Mail maintain ideological positions rooted in their origins, affecting how they frame major moments like Brexit, the COVID-19 pandemic, the death of Queen Elizabeth II, and the Afghanistan conflict. While The Guardian tends to emphasize progressive, investigative, and global perspectives, The Daily Mail leans toward nationalism, traditionalism, and emotional engagement. These differences, deeply rooted in historical contexts, continue to influence public discourse and shape how readers interpret world events.

Historical (and cultural) context question

THIS IS INTENDED TO TALK YOU THROUGH THE KIND OF THINGS YOU MIGHT WISH TO INCLUDE IN AN ESSAY ON HISTORY AND/OR CULTURE. YOU WOULD NEED TO THINK CAREFULLY ABOUT WHICH PARTS WORKED FOR WHICH, BUT REMEMBER THAT HISTORY SHAPES CULTURE.

 

TITLE: EXPLAIN HOW CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXTS INFLUENCE INDIVIDUAL PRODUCERS WITHIN THE NEWSPAPER INDUSTRY.

REFER TO THE GUARDIAN AND THE DAILY MAIL TO SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER

NB: As you read through this essay, remember what you are meant to be looking for:

• Does it answer the question?
• Does it use specific and detailed evidence?
• Does it analyse the evidence?

THE BITS IN RED ARE INTENDED TO TALK YOU THROUGH THE THINKING PROCESS BEHIND THIS ESSAY.

So, in paragraph one, I am trying to show the examiner that I know about the history of the two newspapers.

Paragraph 1:

The Guardian and The Daily Mail’s relationships with their audiences are shaped by the historical context of their creation. The Guardian was founded in 1821 with the intention of promoting liberal values and holding government and powerful private interests to account. In 1872 CP Scott became the editor, pledging to uphold those values. In 1936, ownership was passed to the Scott Trust Ltd. whose trustees still protect the Guardian’s focus on journalistic integrity and speaking truth to power. The Daily Mail was founded in 1896, and by 1902 had the largest circulation of any newspaper in the world, likely because of its populist content, including an increasing focus on entertainment and a surprisingly progressive recognition of the potential market for female readers (it remains one of the only newspapers with a predominantly female readership). In 2024, The Guardian is still focused on journalistic integrity, while The Mail is intent on giving its audience what they want by appealing to their cultural values. <<<< Notice this last sentence (in bold). This is the core of my essay. I can defend it with evidence, but that doesn’t mean it is correct. You can adopt a different perspective if you think that the evidence points in a different direction. But whatever you choose, it needs to be consistent, even if you are reaching an ambiguous conclusion.

 

ANYWAY! By this point, I’m pretty sure that the examiner thinks I understand the founding and development of the papers (HISTORICAL CONTEXT), so now I need to focus on a culturally (and historically if possible) significant event to illustrate my understanding of how this is manifest today. It needs to come from evidence I have in my head. So, I could write about: 

• Brexit, 
• The Death of the Queen, 
• Attitudes to Immigration, 
• Second Lockdown,  
• BLM Rioting etc.

I’m going with Brexit as I can remember the evidence well and because it supports my argument.

 

Paragraph 2:

So how does this difference manifest in the 21st Century? One of the most historically significant events of the last 20 years was the Brexit vote. The Mail’s infamous ‘ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE’ (November 4th 2016) cover, was stridently right-wing, but the cultural context is very significant. Without doubt, the headline is intentionally incendiary, but writer James Slack likely intended it to be supportive of the readership’s pro-Brexit stance. So, we could argue that the paper is simply living up to the historical basic for its news agenda, by offering its middle class English readers a populist reading of the events of the day. The Guardian’s cover of the same day was measured, presenting a factual account of the judicial ruling, as is their historical position. However, like the Daily Mail, the Guardian is aware (and likely supports) its culturally progressive, left wing readership, and so the cover featured a call out to Polly Toynbe’s op-ed about Brexit wreaking ‘havoc.’ The Guardian is not averse to presenting left wing views, but the paper acknowledges that this is Toynbe’s opinion, not that of The Guardian, thereby defending its cultural and political neutrality and its historical reputation for journalistic integrity.

 

The two parts I have highlighted are referencing the core of the essay. For the sake of timing (word count) I have not called back to the core in a concluding sentence. If you have time, you can do that. For example:

So, in relation to Brexit, the historical position of the two papers remains intact, with the Guardian retaining it journalistic integrity and the Mail appealing to its reader’s cultural values.

 

By this point I have written just over 300 words. If I have to stop here I should still get 7 marks, because I’ve answered the question, used evidence FROM BOTH PAPERS to support my response and I’ve analysed the significance of my evidence. But I want to shoot for 10/10 or thereabouts, which means I need a third paragraph. So, I can write about another one of my list of significant events or I can take the opportunity to include something about The Internet. As you will see, I chose the latter.

 

Another culturally significant change in the 21st century has been the influence of the Internet. The cultural and historical context shapes the two paper’s reactions to these changing technological contexts. The Guardian online very closely resembles its print counterpart, using live updates, video content etc. to enhance its liberal messaging rather than allowing itself to become populist; moreover, its donation model seeks revenue without recourse to capitalist control. Its front screen even proclaims that it is seeking donations in order to avoid a “billionaire owner” and compromise its focus on journalistic rigour. Conversely, the content of the MailOnline is significantly different to its print counterpart. Some of its right-wing messaging is toned down and there is more attention paid to soft news and international news. But the influence of historical context is still on display. The MailOnline is aware that its readers are younger and that its circulation reaches a worldwide audience, hence their different cultural values. Evidence of this is visible in the way that it markets itself to Snapchat users; with more than 30 editors and a Snapchat subscriber count of around 15 million people it is clear that MailOnline understands that its youth audience is a vital demographic, while its print circulation makes no such attempt to capture younger readers.

As with the previous paragraph, I am letting the examiner do some of the work in connecting the core together for the sake of time/word count. However, if you are not comfortable with that - and there is a good reason not to be - you can give a minute to a final sentence.

 

As with Brexit, the historical position of the two papers remains intact with regard to the influence of the Internet; the Guardian retains its journalistic integrity and the Mail continues to focus on appealing to its readers’ cultural values.

Political Context - Newspapers

POLITICAL CONTEXT

Individual newspapers may be influenced by a variety of political contexts: from the political affiliation of individual publications, to the ideology of the target audience, to the influence of ownership. The Daily Mail’s messaging is right wing but seems to be most concerned with audience engagement. The Guardian is perceived as left wing but seems to be influenced more by journalistic integrity and an attempt to foster a reputation for political neutrality.

According to a 2017 YouGov poll, The Daily Mail is seen as the most right-wing of mainstream newspapers. However, it’s writers likely see its political messaging as providing a hegemonic preferred reading for the political values of its mainstream middle-class readership. Many publications took an oppositional reading of The Mail’s infamous ‘ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE’ (November 4th 2016) cover, seeing it as stridently right wing, but the individual producers (writer James Slack and editor Paul Dacre) intended to be supportive of their readership’s pro-Brexit stance. The Guardian’s cover of the same day was more measured in its reporting, presenting a factual account of the judicial ruling. However, the cover did feature a call out to Polly Toynbe’s op-ed about Brexit wreaking ‘havoc.’ The Guardian is not averse to presenting left wing views, but the paper acknowledges that this is Toynbe’s opinion, not that of The Guardian, thereby defending its political neutrality and reputation for journalistic integrity.

Curran and Seaton would argue that ownership is the most significant factor influencing media industries. Rupert Murdoch, the billionaire owner of News Corps is infamous for his control of the political messaging of his publications; but what of The Guardian and The Mail? The Guardian is owned by The Scott Trust Ltd, a company created to ensure that The Guardian would have ‘No Billionaire Owner’ (a fact that they share on their homepage). They maintain that this gives them the freedom to prioritise journalistic integrity without the political influence of a powerful owner. Conversely, DMGT is owned by the 4th Viscount Rothermere, a billionaire owner. However, in a 2004 interview with the Independent, he asserted that he keeps his political opinions out of the ‘public arena’ in order to ensure that his editor (Paul Dacre) is not unduly influenced. Hesmondhalgh might suggest that Dacre's position is that of a symbol creator, given the freedom to excite audience engagement. This reinforces the Daily Mail’s core principle, to appeal to the ideology of its readers.

400 Words to here – Scoring 7 or 8.

While The Guardian remains somewhat politically neutral, both publications have strong ties to their support of Labour (The Guardian) and Conservatives (Daily Mail). However, this party-political context doesn’t override the core values of the papers. On January 5th 2021, the front cover of The Daily Mail selected an unflattering image of Boris Johnson, and complained about the loss of freedom for its middle class readers as Britain embarked on a second lockdown. Clearly, it was more committed to its support of the middle-class values of its reader than its party affiliation. Again, audience engagement seems to be the most significant of The Daily Mail’s values. On the same day, The Guardian was far more supportive of Johnson, presenting him as a patriot, weighed down by responsibility and honest about the difficulties ahead. Yet again, The Guardian seemed to prioritise political neutrality and journalistic integrity as its core value.

550 Words to here – Scoring 9 or 10.

ECONOMIC CONTEXT NEWSPAPERS

 LINKS TO ARTICLES:

Daily Mail announces redundancy plans as print readership declines | Daily Mail | The Guardian

Guardian Media Group makes record revenues for news business | The Guardian | The Guardian

TEST/EXAM PREP:

Prepare essays plans for the following three tasks:

Q1: Explain the impact of technological developments and changing economic contexts on the cost for audiences of consuming news. Refer to The Guardian and the Daily Mail to support your answer.

Q2: Explain how economic contexts have impacted the way that newspapers target consumers. Refer to The Guardian and the Daily Mail to support your answer.

Q3: Explain the economic impact of globalisation on the way that newspapers distribute their products to consumers. Refer to The Guardian and the Daily Mail to support your answer. 

In the comments section below, list the examples you intend to use to support your answer and include any new sources you have found to support your response...

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - NEWSPAPER QUESTION

Discuss the way that historical context shapes the way that audiences respond to different stories in newspapers. 

Historical context plays a significant role in shaping the ways audiences respond to stories in different newspapers, particularly when considering outlets like The Guardian and The Daily Mail, which have distinct editorial stances and reader demographics.

The Daily Mail was established in 1896, and has traditionally taken a more right wing political stance, in keeping with its middle England readership. In a 2004 interview with the Independent, owner Jonathan Harmsworth, identified this as the ongoing priority of the paper, suggesting that their social and political stance may have changed over its 100 year (or so) history, but that its desire to serve its readers has not. Throughout its history, The Daily Mail has often reflected and amplified prevailing societal attitudes and anxieties, particularly around topics such as immigration, crime, and national identity. Its response to the historically significant felling of the statue of Colston that took place during the Summer of 2020 exemplifies this, with the cover proclaiming this event as ‘Lawless and Reckless’ and evoking the figure of Churchill to demonstrate its allegiance to its conservative readers and to the importance of British history. Given Harmsworth's assurance that his ownership of the newspaper has no impact on its editorial stance and that his editor (at the time Paul Dacre) has full editorial freedom to serve their readers, it seems very likely that the readership of The Mail will have responded negatively to this historical event, in line with the papers reporting. Moreover, their consistent messaging reinforces the idea that they are fully aware of their audience's right wing response. For example, their cover following the death of Queen Elizabeth was deeply patriotic and its headline "Our hearts are broken" suggested complete value alignment with its readership regarding this historical event.

Conversely, the Guardian was founded in 1821 as a response to the Peterloo Massacre in 1819 and since then, has consistently positioned itself as a liberal voice, advocating for progressive causes, social justice and holding government to account. The newspaper's editorial stance has been shaped by key historical events and its audience has a reputation for being political left-leaning, interested in global affairs, liberal and educated. As such, stories in The Guardian are often framed from a perspective that emphasises liberal values or political neutrality. For example, their reportage of the incident that took place during the historic BLM protests of 2020, simply presented the now famous image of the incident, while their lead story held the government accountable following an accusation of ‘ignorance’ on UK racism. So, we can see that the Guardian manages maintaining its reputation for unbiased journalism and its liberal dedication to holding the powerful to account. Even its reporting of the death of the queen maintained its political neutrality, with its front cover simply presenting an image of her coronation and the dates of her life. Even with an historical event as seemingly unifying as the death of the monarch, the Guardian holds to its unbiased messaging allowing its audience to make up their own minds. 

Clearly, historical context shapes the content of both papers, but their response remains consistent; the Guardian are focused on their ongoing mission to provide a liberal voice that speaks truth to power, while maintaining its reputation for neutrality, while the Daily Mail continue to give their audience the kind of commentary that reinforces their right wing values.

Cultural Context

EXPLAIN HOW CULTURAL CONTEXTS INFLUENCE THE WAY THAT NEWSPAPERS MAINTAIN NATIONAL AND GLOBAL AUDIENCES.  

Refer to The Guardian and the Daily Mail to support your answer. [10]

REMEMBER A GOOD ESSAY WILL:

• Answer the question.
• Have a clear sense of a core argument.
• Use specific and detailed examples.
• Analyse every example carefully. 

Introduction:

The content of newspapers has always been shaped by a need to appeal to the psychographics of its target demographic, with The Daily Mail and The Guardian continuing to frame significant cultural shifts through a lens that will appeal to the values of their respective audiences.  However, the rise of the Internet has heralded a radical shift in the cultural practices around the consumption of news. This technological change has not only altered expectations around immediacy, interactivity, range and cost, it has also facilitated the rise of citizen journalism, which represents a radical change to our cultural expectations around news consumption. 

Section 1: The framing of the social justice movement 

Both The Daily Mail and The Guardian newspapers focus mainly on stories that support their social, cultural and political ideologies, which is key to maintaining audience loyalty, and reinforcing their respective cultural identities. One of the most significant cultural shifts in the last decade has been the growing visibility of the social justice movement and the relative framing of these ideas demonstrates the way that theses publications cater to the psychographic profile of their audience.

Examples: 

8th June 2020 - Covers - BLM activists toppling the Colston statue.

Mail - EZ8BLX5XkAIRBhw (898×1200) (twimg.com)

Guardian - 2.jpg (640×815) (magzter.com)

Other examples might be the framing of Brexit, The framing of lockdowns etc. 

Section 2 : Online News in the Internet age.

The rise of the Internet has been one of the most significant cultural shifts in history, redefining the expectations around the cultural practices of audiences regarding the consumption of news. In particular, there has been a cultural shift in the desire for immediacy, interactivity, range and availability.

Examples: 

News, sport and opinion from the Guardian's UK edition | The Guardian

UK Home | Daily Mail Online

Immediacy: Alarms sounded at 3 p.m., by 4 p.m.

Emergency alert test UK: phone alarm sounds early for some users but others don’t receive it – live updates (theguardian.com)

Tens of millions of phones across Britain receive loud 10 second alarm in emergency alert test | Daily Mail Online

This reflects the 'now' culture that is increasingly pervasive.

Interactivity and Social Media:

News Consumption in the UK 2022 report (ofcom.org.uk)

Not only has interactivity significantly altered the expectation of consumption styles, but it has also radically altered marketing (clickbait).

Range:

The Guardian has maintained a hard news agenda (online content very similar to print). 

The MailOnline is far less nationalistic and favours a soft news agenda. 

Accessibility:

Consider - Platforms, Marketing and Cost.

Section 3: Citizen Journalism 

Citizen journalism has existed since before the explosion of The Internet, but the opportunities presented by interactivity (polls, surveys, reader stories, videos etc.) have developed this into a crucial element of newspaper publication.

Example: Theorist Clay Shirky interviewed in 2010 

Clay Shirky: 'Paywall will underperform – the numbers don't add up' | Clay Shirky | The Guardian

450 - 650 words

Print and email by start of lesson on Wednesday 26th April